Building Effective Peer Mentoring Programs in Schools: An Introductory Guide

Resources for Mentors

Building Effective Peer Mentoring Programs in Schools

This guide provides recommendations for coordinators of cross-age peer mentoring programs in schools, in the areas of program design; participant recruitment, screening and selection, training; and match activities, as well as planning tools for program coordinators.

Access the Resource

View Guide
Building Effective Peer Mentoring Programs in Schools

This guide provides recommendations for coordinators of cross-age peer mentoring programs in schools, in the areas of program design; participant recruitment, screening and selection, training; and match activities, as well as planning tools for program coordinators.

Access the Resource

View Guide

Description of Resource:

Cross-age peer mentoring programs, in which older youth befriend and mentor younger children in a structured environment, are an increasingly popular choice for educators and youth development professionals hoping to create positive outcomes for youth. This guide provides recommendations for program design; participant recruitment, screening and selection; training; and match activities, as well as planning tools for program coordinators.

 

Goals:

To equip program coordinators with information to plan and implement effective cross-age peer mentoring programs for youth in schools.

 

Target Population/Eligibility of Target Sites:

Peer mentoring programs in school settings.

 

Corresponding Elements of Effective Practice:

All

 

Key Personnel:

Mentoring Program Coordinators

 

Additional Information:

It is important to be aware that research indicates peer mentoring programs require supplemental supports in order to achieve effectiveness comparable to adult programs (Herrera et al., 2007). These supports may include, but are not necessarily limited to, enhanced forms of mentor screening and training as well as relatively more frequent and intensive ongoing supervision and problem-solving assistance for mentoring relationships once established. This Guide includes a number of recommendations for practices and safeguards of this nature. However, it should be noted that these generally have not been evaluated in research. Those considering implementation of a peer mentoring program are advised to consult the review of research on one-to-one cross-age peer mentoring that is available on this website.

This publication was funded by the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools at the U.S. Department of Education with EMT Associates, Inc.

Resource Name:

Building Effective Peer Mentoring Programs in Schools: An Introductory Guide

 

Publisher/Source:

Mentoring Resource Center, Education Northwest

 

Author:

Michael Garringer and Patti MacRae

 

Date of Publication:

2008

 

Resource Type:

Program Management Resources

Evaluation Methodology:

Resource has not been evaluated for effectiveness

 

Evaluation Outcomes:

Resource has not been evaluated for effectiveness

 

Evaluation Validity:

Resource has not been evaluated for effectiveness

Accessing and Using this Resource:

This resource can be accessed freely online on Education Northwest’s website: https://educationnorthwest.org/sites/default/files/building-effective-peer-mentoring-programs-intro-guide.pdf

References:

None

 

Evidence Base:

N/A

 

Additional References:

N/A

  • Description of Resource:

    Cross-age peer mentoring programs, in which older youth befriend and mentor younger children in a structured environment, are an increasingly popular choice for educators and youth development professionals hoping to create positive outcomes for youth. This guide provides recommendations for program design; participant recruitment, screening and selection; training; and match activities, as well as planning tools for program coordinators.

     

    Goals:

    To equip program coordinators with information to plan and implement effective cross-age peer mentoring programs for youth in schools.

     

    Target Population/Eligibility of Target Sites:

    Peer mentoring programs in school settings.

     

    Corresponding Elements of Effective Practice:

    All

     

    Key Personnel:

    Mentoring Program Coordinators

     

    Additional Information:

    It is important to be aware that research indicates peer mentoring programs require supplemental supports in order to achieve effectiveness comparable to adult programs (Herrera et al., 2007). These supports may include, but are not necessarily limited to, enhanced forms of mentor screening and training as well as relatively more frequent and intensive ongoing supervision and problem-solving assistance for mentoring relationships once established. This Guide includes a number of recommendations for practices and safeguards of this nature. However, it should be noted that these generally have not been evaluated in research. Those considering implementation of a peer mentoring program are advised to consult the review of research on one-to-one cross-age peer mentoring that is available on this website.

    This publication was funded by the Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools at the U.S. Department of Education with EMT Associates, Inc.

  • Resource Name:

    Building Effective Peer Mentoring Programs in Schools: An Introductory Guide

     

    Publisher/Source:

    Mentoring Resource Center, Education Northwest

     

    Author:

    Michael Garringer and Patti MacRae

     

    Date of Publication:

    2008

     

    Resource Type:

    Program Management Resources

  • Evaluation Methodology:

    Resource has not been evaluated for effectiveness

     

    Evaluation Outcomes:

    Resource has not been evaluated for effectiveness

     

    Evaluation Validity:

    Resource has not been evaluated for effectiveness

  • Accessing and Using this Resource:

    This resource can be accessed freely online on Education Northwest’s website: https://educationnorthwest.org/sites/default/files/building-effective-peer-mentoring-programs-intro-guide.pdf

  • References:

    None

     

    Evidence Base:

    N/A

     

    Additional References:

    N/A