National Mentoring Resource Center Blog

To leave comments on the blog, please enter your name and e-mail address in the fields below. All posts are moderated and will appear after they are approved. Before posting, read the user guidelines

A Spotlight on The Mentoring Enhancement Demonstration Project (MEDP)

SEPTEMBER 17, 2018
BY: BOBBI JO ORTIZ, LCSW, CEO & ANNETTE BAUMANN, BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS (BBBS) EL PASO

Big Brothers Big Sisters (BBBS) El Paso

This blog post is part of a brief series MENTOR has put together highlighting the work of grantees of Mentoring Enhancement Demonstration Project (MEDP) funded by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. This innovative project, which began in FY 2012, was intended to test whether mentoring programs could make enhancements to their usual services that strengthened mentors’ ability to serve as advocates and take on more of an explicit teaching role with their mentees. The hope was that this approach might strengthen mentor-mentee relationships and lead to stronger outcomes for youth.

Now that the evaluation of the project is coming to a close, we wanted to highlight the unique and innovative approaches to teaching and advocacy developed by several of the funded organizations. These posts highlight their excellent work and can illustrate for other mentoring programs how they might approach program improvements and participate in research projects in the future. The National Mentoring Resource Center thanks each grantee for their contributions to the project and for sharing their reflections with us here.

Below is one of many more blog posts to come detailing MEDP grantees wonderful contributions to the mentoring field.


Project Name: Northward Bound Mentoring Enhancement

Project Agencies/Programs Involved: Big Brothers Big Sisters (BBBS) of Lubbock, BBBS of Las Cruces (now BBBS Mountain Region)

Why did you decide to get involved in the MEDP project? What motivated you to take on this effort?

We chose to get involved in this project to enhance services to Hispanic at-risk youth. We were excited about the opportunity to collaborate with two other BBBS agency to identify program enhancement that would benefit mentee in our region. We felt the enhancements would strengthen the relationships between the mentor and mentees. Additionally, we felt that by implementing the enhancements each the Agencies, would strengthen their relationships with both the families and mentors. Furthermore, we felt the enhancements would be particularly relevant in preventing delinquency within the Hispanic population.

Please describe how you approached the idea of teaching and advocacy in your program. How did you all determine the enhancements you were going to implement?

We hosted a collaborative retreat with each agency staff on this project to determine the needs of the mentors and families. We surveyed the mentors and families to determine which training enhancements would most benefit them. At the retreat, we identified 12 of the training topics to implement over the course of the grant. We hosted what we called “Advance Mentor as Advocate Trainings” (Advance MAT) at each site. The trainings followed a very specific format which included a pre and posttest and an advocacy teaching component. Enhanced match plans were created to be administered at the time of match, and would assist in determining the needs of the child and the goals of the match. During each Advance MAT training, the match plan was reviewed by the mentor to determine how the training could be applied to the child’s needs and match goals.

In addition to the Advance MAT we hosted MAT 101 trainings. These trainings were designed to build the understanding of the enhanced advocacy and teaching roles of the Intervention group Mentors. This was a supplement to the agencies current pre-match training that all mentors were required to complete.

We also hosted 18 Match Strengthen Activities. These activities include a description of careers in the field, lessons on the venue, how youth could aspire to become part of this field and focus on career learning. These activities helped reinforced the mentor/mentee bond and helped youth develop a stronger self-identity. For example, an outing was planned at a local amusement park. The participants would receive a “behind the scenes” tour where they would be taught about role of electrical, mechanical and structural engineers who built rollercoasters. They would learn about career opportunities in the engineering field and what type of education was needed. They would then get to enjoy the park with their mentor as a match strengthen activity.

We also hosted a monthly support group for Enhanced Mentors called “Amigo Matters.” These offered the Intervention Mentors a consistent chance to connect and share experiences, learn from each other and get in person feedback for the Intervention Specialist and their peers.

Ed. Note: The agencies involved in this collaborative were kind enough to share one of the resources mentioned here for download and use by others. Please see the download link at the bottom of this post. If your program uses any of the resources developed by MEDP grantees, we ask that you give credit to the funded agencies.

What new or enhanced practices were most effective in your opinion? Were there some ideas that worked better than others?

All of the enhancements, expect for the Amigo Matters, were hugely successfully and impactful. We struggled to get consistent and meaningful participation in the Amigo Matters. We are still doing all of the enhancements, including the Amigo Matters, but have lowered the expectation of the number of participants. We are not able to do all of the enhancements at the same level. This project helped us realize that in order to maintain the enhancements at the most effect level, extra financial support is needed. That would allow case managers to carry a reduced case load and assist in the thoughtful planning and executing of the enhancements.

What didn’t work so well, or needs more refinement? What might you tell other programs to avoid when thinking about making similar enhancements to their programs?

I think programs need to be realistic in the time commitment needed to fulfill the enhancements. They need to ensure they have or can train staff thoroughly and have enough funding to have reduced caseloads. They need staff who are passionate and qualified to carry out the enhancements. What was it like participating in a rigorous federal research project like this? Any advice for other programs who might be participating in evaluations like this? It was very educational and inspiring. It pushed us to think outside the box and engage in self-evaluation. Having the support and guidance of the researchers was extremely valuable. The partnership collaborations help develop many best practices and share lessons learned. It was a significant commitment which required dedicated and qualified staff.


DOWNLOAD:

Enhanced Match Planning Tool (Excel file)

Comments (0)

There are no comments posted here yet

Leave your comments

  1. Posting comment as a guest.
0 Characters
Attachments (0 / 3)
Share Your Location
Type the text presented in the image below

Request no-cost help for your program

Advanced Search